arXiv:2609.26167v1 Announce Type: new

Abstract: Activation-energy pruning -- removing weights whose product of magnitude and cumulative pre-synaptic spike count falls below a threshold -- was established as an effective unsupervised personalization strategy for conventional deep neural networks~\citep{BINGHAM2025101242}. This paper asks what happens when the same criterion is applied to spiking neural networks (SNNs), where activation energy is not merely a useful heuristic but a literal physical quantity proportional to the metabolic cost of each synapse. The answer is surprising on three counts.

First, gradient-based pruning methods that perform competitively on conventional networks (SNIP, GraSP, magnitude pruning) consistently underperform on SNNs, collapsing to near-chance accuracy by $\sigma = 0.2$ sparsity across all tested architectures and datasets. We trace this to a systematic incompatibility between surrogate-gradient saliency estimation and the binary spike-train representation, though we cannot rule out that alternative surrogate choices or hyperparameter settings might partially mitigate the effect.

Second, activation-energy pruning applied to a neuromorphic benchmark \emph{improves} over the source model at high sparsity ($98.4 \pm 0.4\%$ vs.\ $97.2 \pm 0.7\%$ at $\sigma = 0.8$ on N-MNIST), a phenomenon with no counterpart in the conventional network setting. We interpret this result as consistent with experience-dependent cortical specialisation: removing connections active only for non-target classes may reduce cross-class interference and produce a cleaner target representation, though we note this is an interpretive analogy rather than a mechanistic demonstration.