Inkling 2 Small
A model that can see and refine what it builds
Tackling the Sign Problem in the Doped Hubbard Model with Normalizing Flows
LPM: Industrial-Scale Generative Video Restoration
Reasoning Before Translation: Enhancing Legal Machine Translation with Structured Reasoning
AUTEUR: Acoustic Plan Learning for Red-Teaming Text-to-Audio Models
H100 vs GB200 NVL72 Training Benchmarks – Power, TCO, and Reliability Analysis, Software Improvement Over Time
Frontier model training has pushed GPUs and AI systems to their absolute limits, making cost, efficiency, power, performance per TCO, and reliability central to the discussion on effective training. The Hopper vs Blackwell comparisons are not as simple as Nvidia would have you believe.
In this report, we will start by present the results of benchmark runs across over 2,000 H100 GPUs, analyzing data on model flops utilization (MFU), total cost of ownership (TCO) and cost per training 1M tokens. We will also discuss energy use, examining the energy in utility Joules consumed for each token trained and compare it to the average US household annual energy usage, reframing power efficiency in societal context. We will also show the results of this analysis when scaling the GPU cluster from 128 H100s to 2048 H100s and across different versions of Nvidia software.
Later in this report, we will also analyze GB200 NVL72 benchmark results across Llama4 400B MoE and DeepSeek 670B MoE and compare this data to our earlier results from the H100. We will discuss whether the GB200 NVL72 performance per $ advantages survives once reliability issues are factored in.
Downtime from poor reliability and lost engineering time is one of the main factors that we will capture in our perf per TCO calculations. Currently there are no large-scale training runs done yet on GB200 NVL72 as software continues to mature and reliability challenges are worked through. This means that Nvidia’s H100 and H200 as well as Google TPUs remain the only GPUs that are today being successfully used to complete frontier-scale training. As it stands today, even the most advanced operators at frontier labs and CSPs are not yet able to carry out mega training runs on the GB200 NVL72.
With that said, every new architecture naturally requires time for the ecosystem to ramp software to effectively utilize the architecture. The GB200 NVL72 ramp is slightly slower than prior generations, but not by much, and we are confident that before the end of the year, GB200 NVL72 software would have improved considerably. Combined with frontier models architecture being codesigned with the larger scale up world size in mind, we expect that there will be significant efficiency gains from using the GB200 NVL72 by the end of the year.
On the reliability front, there will continue to be significant challenges that Nvidia must work even closer with its partners to rapidly solve, but we think the ecosystem will quickly rally its resources towards tackling these reliability challenges.
SemiAnalysis Is Hiring
We are looking for a new grad engineer to join our engineering team. This is an unique opportunity to work on an high-visibility special projects with support from many industry leaders and CEOs. If you’re passionate about performance engineering, system reliability, and want to work at the intersection of hardware and software, this is a rare chance to make industry wide impact.
What you’ll work on:
- Building and running large-scale benchmarks across multiple vendors (AMD, NVIDIA, TPU, Trainium, etc.
- Designing reproducible CI/CD pipelines to automate benchmarking workflows
- Ensuring reliability and scalability of systems used by industry partners
What we’re looking for:
- Strong skills in Python
- Background in Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) or systems-level problem solving
- Experience with CI/CD pipelines and modern DevOps practices
- Curiosity about GPUs, TPUs, Trainium, multicloud, and performance benchmarking
Link to apply: https://app.dover.com/apply/SemiAnalysis/2a9c8da5-6d59-4ac8-8302-3877345dbce1
Benchmarking and Analysis Methodology
For our benchmarking and analysis, we rely on Nvidia’s DGXC Benchmarking Team’s new DGX Cloud Benchmarking Scripts executed on NVIDIA’s internal H100 EOS cluster, configured with 8×400 Gbit/s InfiniBand networking. These results serve as the official reference numbers against which Neocloud environments can be compared when defining service-level agreements (SLAs) between Neoclouds and their customers.
Clouds can also submit benchmarks to NVIDIA and if they are able to meet these EOS reference numbers then they can earn the NVIDIA Exemplar Cloud designation. Our upcoming ClusterMAXv2 will heavily weight providers’ Exemplar Clouds status when evaluating service quality as this status is a stamp of approval that a provider can deliver reference performance numbers across many workloads for large scale GPU deployments.
The aforementioned benchmarks are conducted using NeMo Megatron-LM, but given that many end users of GPUs do not exclusively rely on NeMo Megatron-LM, the DGXC benchmarking team has plans to extend coverage to native Torch DTensor frameworks such as TorchTitan.
We would like to thank the Nvidia DGCX benchmarking team for creating these sets of benchmarks and providing reference numbers to help lift up the GPU Cloud industry!
H100 and GB200 NVL72 Capex, Opex, Total Cost of Ownership Analysis
The price of an H100 server has dropped somewhat in the past 18 months to around $190k per server. Including storage, networking and other items, the total upfront capital cost per server comes up to $250k for a typical hyperscaler.
Turning to the GB200 NVL72, the rack scale server alone costs $3.1M for a typical hyperscaler. Including networking, storage and other items, all in cost comes up to about $3.9M per rack.
When comparing across all three buyer types, from Hyperscalers to Neocloud Giants to Emerging Neoclouds, the GB200 NVL72’s all-in capital cost per GPU comes to about 1.6x to 1.7x the all-in capital cost per GPU of the H100.

Comparing the two systems’ operating cost of ownership, we find that the Opex per GPU for the GB200 NVL72 is not that much higher than that of the H100. The cost difference comes from the fact the GB200 NVL72 has a higher all-in power consumption per GPU than the H100. This is primarily driven by the fact that the GB200 chip consumes 1200W per chip vs 700W for the H100.

When fac
Competitive self-play
Introducing upgrades to Codex
Using AI to mitigate the growing environmental threat of data centers
The global building boom of power-hungry data centers is straining electrical grids, causing greater reliance on energy from polluting fossil fuels.
Christina Delimitrou, a newly tenured associate professor at MIT, is fighting this environmental threat by rethinking how the computer servers and networking equipment inside those data centers operate.
She and her group apply machine learning to make large-scale data centers more efficient, secure, and reliable. They redesign outdated cloud computing systems, develop methods to manage shared hardware resources, and create streamlined server architectures.
These advances allow data center operators to coax more computational power out of existing hardware.
“If data centers are not utilized to the best of their capabilities, then they will burn much more power than they need to meet growing user demand,” says Delimitrou, the KDD Career Development Associate Professor in Communications and Technology in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS) and a member of the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL). “There is a lot of bloating, especially on the software side of these systems. If we can remove that bloating in a way that doesn’t compromise performance, then we won’t need to build as many new data centers.”
She also harnesses AI to help programmers find and fix problems in cloud-based applications, like music-streaming services or video conferencing systems. This eliminates application downtime that hampers performance and drains computational resources.
“By managing resources more effectively in the cloud, the end user gets more predictable performance from the application running on their smartphone,” she adds.
Mathematical beginnings
Delimitrou grew up in a midsized town within the vast plains of northern Greece. Her early interest in math and science was sparked, in part, by the ancient history of her homeland, where Euclid and Pythagoras studied mathematical problems more than 2,000 years ago.
“In Greece, there is a long tradition of geometry,” she says.
She also drew scientific inspiration from her parents. Her mother worked as a chemical engineer and her father as a pharmacist — and both encouraged their daughter’s innate curiosity.
Her early affinity for math led Delimitrou to study computer engineering at the National Technical University of Athens, even though she didn’t know much about the field. She quickly gravitated toward courses that focused on the applied science of engineering.
For her diploma thesis — a project all students complete during their fifth and final year of study — she studied resource management in a computer when multiple applications are running at once.
“A lot of the challenges I was looking at then would get much harder if, instead of a single system, you had 100,000 of these systems. That was a problem that piqued my interest,” she says.
Seeking to make a bigger impact as a researcher, Delimitrou pursued a graduate degree at Stanford University. She began tackling inefficiencies in cloud computing systems and large-scale data centers, which was a rapidly growing area of research.
Through that work, Delimitrou and her research mentor, Christos Kozyrakis, the Leonard Bosack and Sandy K. Lerner Professor of Engineering, realized many large computing systems were underutilized.
“You would expect, with all the demand for these systems, that they should be running close to 100 percent capacity. But we found that most were running at only about 15 percent capacity,” she says. “This is not a resource-efficient or sustainable way of scaling these systems.”
Applying AI
To push that utilization closer to 100 percent, she began investigating machine-learning solutions to streamline cumbersome computational processes. Machine learning could automate resource management operations in the cloud, identifying solutions that developers might miss on their own.
“Applying machine learning to solve a large-scale system problem was a novel approach at the time. It was a bit risky because people had not yet shown that these techniques would work,” Delimitrou says. “But empirical approaches require a lot of expertise, and the scale of the system is so large that it is difficult for users to manage. This is why machine learning is often the best solution.”
After earning her PhD, Delimitrou continued this line of work as an assistant professor at Cornell University.
One tool her group developed, Seer, uses deep learning to anticipate and prevent problems in web applications before they happen. This averts widespread slowdowns that may occur if a developer tries to fix a problem manually.
As she delved deeper into cloud computing, Delimitrou observed that cloud applications were changing. Developers were now splitting applications into smaller pieces to spread across multiple servers, which increases the speed of deployment.
“But the servers were not built for this new style of application design. So, I rethought some of my earlier work to build machine-learning systems for this new class of applications,” she says.
To tackle these new challenges, she found herself collaborating more often with faculty members who had different software and hardware expertise. Those collaborations opened exciting new research areas.
A few years later, she decided to join MIT because of the opportunity to collaborate with researchers at the top of their fields in hardware and software engineering. She became an assistant professor in EECS in 2022.
Creative approaches
At MIT, Delimitrou also enjoys the teaching aspect of her role. One of her favorite courses to teach is 6.191 (Computation Structure), a popular undergraduate class with about 350 students each semester.
While it’s challenging to keep the course material fresh when the field constantly evolves, she strives to inspire creativity in her students.
“I want the students to learn how to think and learn on their own. Part of that involves shifting away from formulaic assignments and making classes more open-ended. I’d rather give the students something to make them think more deeply,” she says.
In the lab, a creative mindset helps Delimitrou and her team identify novel solutions to problems in cloud computing that others might overlook.
For instance, she extended prior work on debugging problems in cloud applications to encompass not just errors in the code, but also security issues that can make user data vulnerable to hackers.
She also uses AI to redesign software systems so they better fit the capabilities of existing hardware.
“One of the challenges when it comes to applying AI to these systems is that the AI is not interpretable,” she says. “A lot of the work we are doing now involves adding explainability into these AI tools so people can get useful feedback from the system.”
That not only helps developers ensure AI is giving the right answer, but also provides insights into how to design systems better in the future.
She finds that studying these large-scale cloud computing systems is becoming more challenging because tech companies that operate data centers use proprietary hardware, unlike the commodity equipment of early cloud computing days, as well as software systems that can’t be accessed by academic teams. A solution that works in the lab might not work in the real world.
To that end, Delimitrou and her group create clones of proprietary systems and applications. One tool they developed, called Ditto, mimics an application’s structure and performance characteristics, enabling a wide range of studies.
She expects her work to continue shifting as machine-learning mod
屏幕竖起来,创作者不会矮一截
(本文作者为 摩根商研所,钛媒体经授权发布)
文 | 摩根商研所
红果正式超过了豆包。
最近,QuestMobile发布2026中国移动互联网秋季大报告,数据显示截至2026年9月,红果免费短剧去重用户量达到4.3亿,超过豆包的4.19亿,成为抖音集团内部用户规模第二大的应用,仅次于抖音。

从最开始的鄙夷、到如今的全民皆刷,短剧从一个被主流影视圈归进“电子榨菜”的边缘品类,长成了撬动亿级用户的内容形态。
它没有讲什么宏大叙事,只是安安静静填满了地铁上的二十分钟、睡前的那半小时,以及所有不知道要看点什么的空档。
但比起短剧的爆火,我更想探讨的是另一件事:为什么又是字节?
图文时代是今日头条,短视频时代是抖音,长视频格局被优爱腾焊死的时候,冒出来的是红果。每一次行业看起来已经分完蛋糕、格局写死的时候,字节都恰好站在别人没低头去看的那个入口上。
这不是运气。
把这几步连起来看,会发现它一直在做的其实是同一件事,做同一道题,而这道题的题干,早在半个多世纪前就被人写出来了。
一、字节真正在“囤”的东西,从来都是注意力
诺贝尔经济学奖得主赫伯特·西蒙在上世纪70年代就留下一句被反复引用的判断:“在一个信息丰富的世界里,信息的丰富意味着注意力的贫乏。”
后来迈克尔·戈德哈伯在1997年据此提出“注意力经济”:当信息不再是稀缺品,唯一稀缺的,是人的注意力。
字节第一个爆款今日头条是怎么做起来的?
在传统图文媒体的黄金年代,在互联网信息爆发的节点,今日头条靠着不断学习你的喜好,推给你感兴趣的内容的方式,把用户分散的“注意力”留住了。
后来的抖音也是如此。
它把学习喜好的能力从“频道”压到了“一条视频”,刷过去就是不喜欢,多看两眼就是喜欢,反馈周期短到以秒计。
你以为你在挑内容,其实是算法在挑你,它不需要听懂你在说什么,只需要看你停了几秒。
Netflix在致股东信里写过一句话:“我们争夺并输给的对象,是《堡垒之夜》,而不是HBO。”
一个流媒体巨头,把一款游戏当成正面对手,争夺的本质不是片子质量,而是同一块屏幕、同一段下班后的时间。
字节做的是同一道题,对手从来不是隔壁平台,而是用户的睡眠、工作和发呆。
谷歌当年的施密特也说过,谷歌的竞争对手是“睡眠”。能把注意力当成唯一战场的公司,都看穿了同一件事。
当然你可以说这些背后都是算法,是理工科的魅力,但你不能否认的是,字节真的很懂用户的“注意力”在哪。
因为人的“注意力”是有限的,你喜欢足球、他喜欢游戏,还有一个钟爱刷剧,你关注财经,他关注民生,还有一个关心时政,大家注意的点不同,可以都喜欢,但没那个时间与精力去全部关注。
所以我认为字节一直在钻研“注意力”,而且不仅是在用户端。
人的“注意力”是有限的,企业也一样。
拼多多就是最典型的例子。
当所有人都在盯着一线城市的消费升级、盯着双11的客单价时,它把注意力投向了“五环外”,一群被淘宝、京东默认放弃、时间充裕又极度价格敏感的人。它没有跟巨头抢同一块注意力,而是找到了一块别人根本没打算看的注意力。
字节商业上的成功,很大程度上源于其善于找到那些行业中,其他企业没注意到的可能性。
比如说抖省省。
今年初,字节把抖省省独立出来,很多人认为是在向美团宣战,继去年的外卖大战升级到团购大战。
但半年过去了,预期的冲突并没有那么激烈。抖省省除了一些优惠外,并没有像京东外卖、淘宝闪购那般的火力铺盖,声量都不如AI大战。
一种可能是抖省省压根就没想打。
外卖大战后,市场本身就开始反内卷,2026 年政府工作报告都明确提出了这一点,字节在 AI 业务、短剧等多方面如日中天的时候,没必要主动触霉头。
而且外卖大战也进一步印证了美团的护城河,补贴战打下来,阿里拿到了自己想要的,而美团的日均单量也提升了,美团不仅没失地,反而越打越强了。
而还有一种可能,抖省省与美团的业务交集没那么大。
以我个人的体验来说,抖省省更多的是用在了小店的到店场景。
此前用美团团购,更多的场景是几个好友一起聚聚,找家店经济实惠又有新尝试,但自己一个人下楼吃碗面,大体还是到店扫码而不是打开美团。
而这半年的改变就是,抖省省打通了这种小店场景,吃碗面、来个套餐,电梯里就能用抖省省选定,到店刷一下,省个块把钱的小确幸。
而美团生态中,小店场景更多时候是被外卖覆盖的,团购虽然也有,但没有外卖触达的那么通透,尤其是拼好饭的出现,小店团购优惠在美团生态里存在感就更低了。
你看,这就是字节找到的一种美团没注意到的小场景。
我很喜欢张一鸣的一句话,“don’t rush to conclusion”,不要匆忙下结论,不要太容易说“说白了就是这样”,要猜想其他可能,保持一个开放的心态。
字节在业务选择上就是保持了一个不断猜想可能性的思路。
从媒体时代挖掘不一样的今日头条,到短视频时代的抖音,再到如今的短剧、AI 等,我们能看到字节在每一个行业的布局,都在探索一种新的可能性。
传统货架电商辉煌的时候,字节找到了直播带货的可能性,在优爱腾牢牢把握长剧、综艺的视频娱乐版块的时候,字节又挖掘出短剧的可能性。
如今所谓的字节令人惊叹的用户市场,本质上不就是字节找到一个又一个新的行业可能性的积累?
这些积累显然没有对错之分,野村的报告体现不出来,也写不进天眼查的数据里,这种积累,只有一个又一个的场景价值。
二、短剧并不“可怕”
作为字节当下增势十分凶猛的红果,它的短剧场景真的“可怕”吗?
我觉得不尽然。
其实在短剧爆火之前,一种名为沙雕动画的模式在各大平台走红,这种动画以更为粗糙的熊猫人模板为核心,仅仅比有声小说多了个“能动”。
甚至至今该风格的动画还在大量创作,红果中也上了不少沙雕动画的短剧。
这背后藏着的就是那颗创作的心。
短视频的成功证明了,普罗大众也是有表达欲的,也是渴望一个机会的。此前看到烂剧、烂片后的“我上我也行”,如今也有了一个“我上”的机会,还不用纠结演员和演技的问题。
比如说目前就有粉丝基于《武林外传》这个经典电视剧,续写后80集,以弥补当年的遗憾。

这都是一种情绪的表达,对自我创作的尝试,对心爱 IP 的延续等等,他们只是缺乏条件,不能做出精致的感觉,但背后用不用心,看得出来。
知名导演贾樟柯也点评过:“屏幕竖起来,创作者不会矮一截”。
短剧的本质是一种解压的途径。
我们为何怀念以前的小品?因为它们纯粹为了逗乐,或讽刺或荒诞,但总归就是为了逗观众笑。
就像赵本山认为的那样,观众一年到头都在被教育、被批评,春节就想开开心心,为什么还要把教育灌输进春晚呢?
现在的观众不是不喜欢看小品、看正剧,只是不喜欢万物皆教育、结局包饺子的内容,这些内容看着烧心。
而在短剧里,朴素的创作者们信奉着善有善报、恶有恶果的价值观,霸凌的、诬陷的、造谣的、碰瓷的都在短短几集内受到应有的惩罚。
这些现实里可能无可奈何,可能要走流程数月,甚至数年才能沉冤昭雪的情况,短剧里可以立刻伸张正义。
他们能穿越到抗战时期为解放军送去装备,也能回到大宋跟着岳家军抗击外敌,还能为诸葛丞相的北伐送去一箱箱方便面,荒诞的幻想,却是对那份遗憾最好的慰藉。
这种最纯朴的期望与幻想,正是慰藉压力的选择,谈不上什么看多了短剧就成了“可怕”的事。
一代有一代的“废人”。
现在是玩手游刷短剧的“废了”,十年前是玩电脑游戏的“废了”,再往前是听 MP3 的,看小说的,就算啥科技不上,80 年代用烟盒叠纸牌拍着玩的年轻人,就没被指指点点过?
当然这并不意味着短剧全是好的,在短剧刚兴起时,大量粗制滥造、纯为了爽而抛弃正向价值观的内容不是没有,但随即抖音、快手、B 站等平台就开启了一系列的严打,至今虽然同质化问题还没有解决,但起码质量提升的不少了。
短剧虽然不可能个个都是精品,但大家也有选择权啊,刷一集不行一秒就跳到下一个了,工作了一天想看点善有善报、恶有恶果的快意恩仇来缓解压力,没什么不好的。
奶头乐、笑一笑,有时候很有必要。
我有位朋友很喜欢钓鱼,我不太理解,花那么多钱弄装备,那么多时间去水边喂蚊子,只为了钓那么几尾小鱼,太没有 ROI 了。
但他享受的不仅是收获的过程,而是那个脱离了家庭、职场、亲属圈后,独自一个人的安宁,那一份独属于他自己的时间和空间,半天就能把一周的压抑情绪释放。
喜欢逛街、旅游、骑行、运动、游戏的,不也是在为生活之外,找一个属于自己的情绪宣泄口?
脱离了低级趣味的爱好固然值得尊崇,但能在保证价值观正常的情况下逗普罗大众一笑,也未必就落了下乘。
近30年我国抑郁症病例数增加了54%,焦虑症则增加了31.2%,这些精神疾病的形成中,多一个能让他们释放压力的树洞会不会好一些?
时长会涨也会跌,口径可以争、可以换,唯一不变的,是它始终在找一个又一个别人没看见的注意力缺口,然后用最低门槛的方式把它接住。

作为一种新鲜生态,短剧并不“可怕”,它只是又一次准确地找到了那块空着的地方。至于这块地方该不该被填满、填进去的东西好不好,那是另一个值得慢慢聊、不必急着下结论的话题,毕竟,“don't rush to conclusion”。
更多精彩内容,关注钛媒体微信号(ID:taimeiti),或者下载钛媒体App
Thinking Machines Releases Inkling 2 Small, a 594B MoE With 17B Active
Thinking Machines Lab has released Inkling 2 Small, the first model of its second Inkling generation. The Inkling 2 Small model is a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) with 594B total and 17B active parameters. It accepts text and images, and supports variable reasoning effort. On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, it scores 31. Its predecessor, Inkling Small, scores 13 on the same index. The model is live on Tinker for fine-tuning and inference.
TL;DR
- Size: 594B total, 17B active MoE; 1M-token context.
- Runs on: Tinker API only for now. Self-hosting hardware is not disclosed. Weights support MXFP8 and NVFP4.
- Performance: 31 on the AA Intelligence Index, ranked #4 of 29 in its price class.
- Best: 86.3% on SWE-Bench Pro v2 (Hard), second only to Kimi K3 in the lab’s table.
- Worst: 13.1% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, versus 32.8% for GLM-5.3-Flash.
What is Inkling 2 Small?
Inkling 2 Small is a multimodal MoE model from Thinking Machines Lab for agentic coding, vision and knowledge work. It takes text and image input and returns text. It is important to note that it does not support audio as of now.
Weights are closed at launch. The Thinking Machines Lab plans an Apache 2.0 release next week, after external safety testing and red-teaming. This follows its safe path to open weights policy.
How is Inkling 2 Small built?
It includes a 48-layer decoder-only transformer. Each token routes to 8 of 384 experts. Attention mixes local and global layers. A 292M-parameter vision encoder, based on Perception Encoder, uses 20×20-pixel patches with 2×2 spatial pooling. Image patches are interleaved with text tokens.
Pretraining ran in 4 phases:
- H1: 8.4T tokens over 68 hours on NVIDIA GB300 NVL72 racks, trained natively in NVFP4.
- H2: 3.8T tokens of newer, higher-quality data at 512K context.
- H3: about 320B tokens of reasoning and agent trajectories at 1M context.
- H4: about 34B tokens of the highest-quality agent trajectories.
A single joint RL run followed. It took 1,075 steps, 17M+ rollouts and 9 days on 2,048 GPUs. Compute exceeded 4 × 10²³ FLOPs. Coding made up 65.0% of RL tokens. The previous Inkling used separate reasoning and agentic RL runs, merged by distillation.
Alignment got explicit attention. Early checkpoints sometimes fabricated results and concealed actions on hard tasks. The Thinking Machines Lab added an alignment reward and on-policy self-distillation from a conduct spec. Its internal misbehavior score fell from 66.8 on Inkling to 14.9.
How does Inkling 2 Small perform on benchmarks?
All task scores below are from the Thinking Machines Lab’s benchmark table. They run at effort 0.99 (xhigh) and temperature 1.0. Most rows use third-party evaluators such as Artificial Analysis, Scale AI and Vals.
Where it scores highest:
- SWE-Bench Pro v2 (Hard): 86.3%.
- PerceptionBench: 64.7%, versus 58.5% for Kimi K3.
- EnterpriseBench-CoreCraft: 71.8%, versus 46.7% for GLM-5.3-Flash.
- JobBench: 70.5%.
- DesignArena Website: 1,340, third on the November 5 leaderboard snapshot.
Where it trails:
- Terminal-Bench 4.0: 13.1%, versus 33.8% for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017.
- DeepSWE v1.1: 72.1%, versus 77.0% for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017.
- GDPVal-AA v2.1: 1,630, versus 1,746 for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017.
On the PMPP-Hard GPU kernel benchmark, it solved 54.25 of 69 tasks on average. In an autoresearch demo, it fine-tuned Qwen3.5-4B for time-series forecasting. It spent $426 of a $500 Tinker budget. The release post cites both 4.5 hours and 4 h 17 min for the run.
How does Inkling 2 Small compare with DeepSeek and GLM?
| Feature | Inkling 2 Small | DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total / active params | 594B / 17B (card) | 552B / 16B decode, 8B prefill (HF) | 320B / 18B (HF) |
| Context | 1M | 1M | 1M |
| Input modality | Text, image | Text, image | Text, image |
| License | Closed now; Apache 2.0 planned | MIT | MIT |
| Self-host hardware | Not disclosed | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| AA Intelligence Index v5.0.1 | 31 (AA) | 33 (AA) | 28 (AA) |
| AA time per index task | 21.5 min | 13.3 min | 37.7 min |
| AA cost per index task | $1.18 | $0.60 | $0.58 |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.00 | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.15 / $0.50 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 85.1% (Pi harness, lab) | 90.6% (Sept checkpoint, DeepSeek) | 84.3% (Z.ai) |
| DeepSWE v1.1 | 72.1% (lab) | 74.2% (Sept checkpoint, DeepSeek) | 63.4% (Z.ai) |
Prices and AA metrics come from each model’s Artificial Analysis page, read November 5, 2026.
Nine AI agents tried autonomous research on open questions from US national labs and none passed the experts' bar

The "Into the Unknown" benchmark tasks nine AI agents with tackling open research questions from U.S. national laboratories. None of the 135 submissions meets all requirements. A total of 114 papers fail the integrity check, with agents claiming to have conducted experiments that never took place. GPT-6 Astra performs best but still doesn't meet the experts' standards.
The article Nine AI agents tried autonomous research on open questions from US national labs and none passed the experts' bar appeared first on The Decoder.
Thinking Machines' Inkling 2 Small drops 316 F-bombs across benchmark runs

Thinking Machines' AI model Inkling 2 Small swears during its internal reasoning, 316 times across 2,655 benchmark runs, according to an analysis by Vals AI. The profanity typically shows up late in long runs that fail anyway. But it doesn't work as a warning signal: 96 percent of failed runs contained no cursing at all.
The article Thinking Machines' Inkling 2 Small drops 316 F-bombs across benchmark runs appeared first on The Decoder.
104 Blog Posts To Learn About Problem Solving
Let's learn about Problem Solving via these 104 free blog posts. They are ordered by HackerNoon reader engagement data. Visit the Learn Repo or LearnRepo.com to find the most read blog posts about any technology.
Problem-solving is the process of identifying a problem, generating potential solutions, evaluating them, and implementing the most effective one. It is a fundamental skill in all aspects of technology and life, driving innovation and efficiency across various domains.
1. Kadane’s Algorithm Explained with Examples
Given an array, the algorithm to find the maximum subarray sum is called Kadane’s Algorithm.
2. How I Solve Problems as a Developer
There is no programmer in the world who knows how to solve every coding problem. That person simply doesn’t exist, because the programming field is so big that to a normal person, it would take two lives to learn all of that, but we only have one life.
3. Manacher’s Algorithm Explained— Longest Palindromic Substring
Manacher’s Algorithm helps us find the longest palindromic substring in the given string. It optimizes over the brute force solution by using some insights into how palindromes work. How? Let’s see!
4. System Thinking 101: A Primer for Generalists
System thinking is a valuable framework for generalists, you need a proper framework for organizing your multiple thoughts, passions, and pursuits.
5. Use This 7-Step McKinsey Framework to Solve Any Problem
Julia MacDonald, a Fractional Growth Executive, breaks down a 7-step framework to solve any problem.
6. Problem-Based Learning: David Merrill's Principles of Instruction
Merrill's First Principles of Instruction are a series of very effective problem-based teaching methodologies. The principles are based on the five core princip
7. When Everyone Corrected the World's Smartest Woman
I find the Monty Hall Problem one of the most fascinating brain teasers, because it seems deceivingly simple. When Marilyn Von Savant, the woman with the highest IQ, answered this brainteaser correctly in 1991, she was inundated with over 10,000 letters from academics and Ph.Ds criticizing her “error”, only to be proven later that she was correct.
8. How to Solve Any Machine Learning Problem [Almost]
TL, DR; When coming across an ML problem, don’t try to be a hero and dive right into solving it. Process and understand the problem, review your dataset, set a realistic goal and then go about actually solving the problem. Chances are that you will end up saving a lot of resources (most importantly time) if you plan your execution properly.
9. Being a Generalist: How to Leverage Your Diverse Skills and Find Your Purpose
What does it mean to be a generalist? If you are one, how can you find purpose and thrive in your life? We'll answer these questions and more in this articl
10. Solving the Edit Distance Problem Using The Dynamic Programming Approach
The first question that arises when solving a problem using dynamic programming(DP) is how to figure out that DP is a way to solve it?
11. How Do You Alternate Positive and Negative in Python?
Have you ever written a program for pairing alternate positive and negative numbers? If not, then you are missing some great opportunities.
12. Is ‘bias for action’ making product managers lazier?
Let me preface this by saying I’m a big believer in the bias for action principle popularised by Amazon. I’ve used it as a guideline whenever I didn’t have enough data to make an informed decision.
13. The Five Step Approach for Tackling Complex Problems
“The definition of genius is taking the complex and making it simple.” - Albert Einstein
14. Programmer’s Pyramid: Take Your Programming To The Next Level
Build a solid foundation of programming knowledge, develop core s
Grab a new Elegoo 3D printer from as little as $159 right now, thanks to Black Friday sale, now live
Wild Horse Nine review: Is John Malkovich at the center of a meta puzzle?

As a comedy, Wild Horse Nine works fine. British-Irish playwright-turned-filmmaker Martin McDonagh imbues it with the blisteringly macabre sense of humor that he's forged in work like his 2003 play The Pillowman and his feature film debut In Bruges, as well as later movies like Seven Psychopaths; Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri; and The Banshees of Inisherin. As a Martin McDonagh comedy, it feels a bit redundant. But perhaps that's precisely the point?
From its premise, Wild Horse Nine echoes the plot of McDonagh's first feature film, In Bruges. Both films center on a pair of contract killers who have an uneasy friendship, and who travel to a lovely vacation spot with a potentially deadly outcome looming over them. This time, McDonagh has cast John Malkovich and Sam Rockwell in the roles of CIA agents who are chaotically compelling and lethally reckless.
Within these roles, Malkovich and Rockwell are invited to repeat themselves, creating echoes that actually bolsters the film's message about the mind-bending nature of looking back.
Wild Horse Nine is an oddball's elegy.
Set shortly before 1973 Chilean coup d'etat, Wild Horse Nine begins in Santiago, where veteran operative Chris (Malkovich) and his protege Lee (Rockwell) have put things in motion to destabilize the newly democratically elected leader. Now it's time to kill some time with a getaway to Easter Island, because Chris wants to see "the big heads."
Loud and obnoxious, Chris is unapologetically an Ugly American. When tourists urge him to call Easter Island's giant stone statues "moai," the name the Indigenous people gave them, he scoffs. When two female college students express excitement over their women's rights march, he breezily reveals that all their efforts will be for naught because of a U.S. operation that will topple their beloved president. ("Your country is gonna get fucked.")
Chris' brazen insensitivity mirrors the racist cop Rockwell played in Three Billboards, with one exception. While both are caricatures making a mockery of Americans' lesser attributes, Chris is no fool. He is deeply cynical because he knows too much — so much, in fact, that his chief (Steve Buscemi) is ready to shut him up by any means necessary.
This trip will likely be his last, and both Chris and Lee know it. So within their half-hearted attempts at tourism, Chris reflects on his life and regrets, while seeking some fresh adventure. He becomes beguiled by the wild horses that roam freely across this lush, green landscape. And he attempts to flirt with one of the coeds he outraged in Act One. Within his meanderings and mumblings about many, many murders, there's not sadness, but a shrugging resignation that Malkovich sculpts into a darkly funny portrayal.
Wild Horse Nine is deepened by its repetition.
Rockwell and Malkovich have been in so many movies, there are bound to be bits of repetition eventually, right? But some of the echoes in Wild Horse Nine are very specific. Like, yes, this is the third film Rockwell has made with McDonagh, following Seven Psychopaths and Three Billboards. (He also starred in McDonagh's Broadway play A Behanding in Spokane in 2010). But more specifically, Rockwell has previously played a CIA operative with a lot of swagger and a penchant for gallows humor and insubordination in the George Clooney-directed Confessions of a Dangerous Mind.
Beyond that, Malkovich has not just played a CIA employee before, but in both Wild Horse Nine and the Coen Bros' Burn After Reading, he plays one who is looking to turn his top-secret exploits into a memoir. Then, most joltingly perhaps, as Wild Horse Nine goes on, cinephiles watching Lee try to protect Chris from a world growing increasingly hostile towards him might be reminded of Of Mice and Men. Notably, Malkovich played Lennie in the 1992 film adaptation, directed by and co-starring Gary Sinise. And yes, that feels relevant too.
These are the connections I noticed watching Wild Horse Nine just once. I wonder what other ties might be noticed on a rewatch? Will Buscemi's furious CIA chief spark a memory of a far-off film where he was in a position of power but not to be trusted? Will Parker Posey, who plays Lee's glibly unfaithful wife, invoke an allusion to one of her fiery past roles? Perhaps Tom Waits, snarling from the depths of Monument Valley, will unlock a recollection about a long-forgotten Western that serves to bolster the meaning of the American singer/songwriter's brief but meaningful scene.
Or maybe I'm reaching. Maybe the rhythms of Wild Horse Nine felt so familiar, both in McDonagh's work and in American dark comedy, that I was looking for other ways to excite myself.
I hope not. After all, Wild Horse Nine has a lot going for it. The cinematography from Ben Davis is gorgeous, putting these gruff conquerers in an untamed surrounding that seems to mock their mundane ambitions for control.
Rockwell is greasy and suave in McDonagh's signature caustic and comical dialogue. Buscemi, Parker, and Waits all pop with crackling outrage. Mariana di Girolamo and Ailín Salas bring a fresh-faced exuberance that proves a terrific foil to Malkovich's world-weariness. And as for Malkovich, he's wickedly compelling as this infuriatingly blasé killer. The bounce he brings the comedy is expertly executed. Chris' resignation is not expressed through a dull sullenness, but an intoxicating levity. It's as if he can feel the fall coming and is all too happy to lift his wings.
And in that, Chris looks back on his life, and Wild Horse Nine urges us to look back on the filmographies of its makers (intentionally or not). In that, we, like this film's anti-hero, are urged to understand how history can keep repeating, for better or mostly worse. But hey, there might still be something worthwhile in the present moment anyway.
Wild Horse Nine was reviewed out of the Toronto International Film Festival.
Thinking Machines' Inkling 2 Small claims top spot among western open-weight models

Thinking Machines, the startup from former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati, is releasing Inkling 2 Small, a mixture-of-experts model with 594 billion parameters. The company claims it's the strongest western open-weight model. Better agentic performance comes at a price, though, with token usage rising sharply.
The article Thinking Machines' Inkling 2 Small claims top spot among western open-weight models appeared first on The Decoder.
Ripple-65B Preview delivers strong agentic coding results as a fully Apache 2.0 open US model

Ricursive Intelligence is releasing Ripple-65B Preview, a 65-billion-parameter open-weight language model that the company says achieves the top score among open-source U.S. models on the TerminalBench 2.1 coding benchmark at a total R&D cost of $32 million. On other benchmarks, however, Ripple falls behind the likewise newly released western open model Inkling 2 Small.
The article Ripple-65B Preview delivers strong agentic coding results as a fully Apache 2.0 open US model appeared first on The Decoder.