“全球大模型第一股”来了！“中国OpenAI”智谱正式在港交所挂牌上市 - 中国科技网
Sora退场不等于终局，中国多模态大模型仍在关键赛点 - IDC | Trusted Tech Intelligence
中国AI大模型又赢了！连续28周领先美国 全球前五拿下四席 - 凤凰网
Not Even Tech’s Safest Jobs Look So Safe Anymore - The New York Times
What to Know About Nvidia’s Investigation of Its C.E.O. - The New York Times
AI pulls up the civil service ladder to Southeast Asia’s middle class - South China Morning Post
Data Precedes Artificial Intelligence - Defense.info
The only town in the U.S. that said yes to data centers - The Washington Post
Playing with the STM32MP2
Advice needed regarding classical ML conference submission [D]
Hi,
I need some advice on submission of classical ML papers in top conferences.
During my PhD I made some findings in classical ML (related to SVM and LR) which, on further deep diving, looks like original work (I checked with chatGPT and Gemini too).
When I tried to submit them to top conferences, while the reviewers have been reasonable in their reviews (acknowledging the innovation while asking me to run some more experiments and ablation studies), the AC shot down my paper, saying “this is a done and dusted topic”. Only at ACL did the AC ask me to resubmit incorporating the comments.
So is classical ML dead at top conferences? Are only deep learning and LLM works being accepted at top conferences? And should I stop trying to submit at top conferences and maybe try journals or simply Arxiv my work?
[link] [comments]